798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff

The History of Literature50mMay 6, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this episode of The History of Literature, host Jack Wilson interviews David Womersley, Thomas Wharton Professor of English Literature at Oxford, about his book *Thinking Through Shakespeare*. Womersley argues that Shakespeare remains enduringly relevant not because he offers definitive answers about human nature, but because he masterfully explores four perennial philosophical questions: identity, the tension between civilization and barbarism, the relationship between political power and religious authority, and the conflict between moral intuition and utilitarian expediency. He challenges the late 20th-century theoretical turn in literary studies that dismissed the idea of universal human nature, asserting instead that while human behavior varies across time and space, core human concerns—like love, power, justice, and moral ambiguity—remain constant. Womersley uses *King Lear* and *Measure for Measure* to illustrate how Shakespeare presents opposing moral frameworks without resolving them, allowing audiences to wrestle with the complexity of ethical dilemmas. He praises Shakespeare’s genius for avoiding dogma, calling it a form of intellectual freedom. The episode concludes with a reflective conversation with Ramie Targoff, who shares her choice for her last book: George Eliot’s *Middlemarch*, which she sees as a profound, compassionate, and endlessly revealing novel that grows with the reader across a lifetime. Together, the discussions affirm literature’s power not to provide answers, but to deepen our capacity for thoughtful, empathetic engagement with the human condition.

Key Takeaways
1

Shakespeare’s enduring power lies not in offering moral answers, but in posing timeless philosophical questions with profound depth and balance.

2

The late 20th-century theoretical turn in literary studies, which questioned the idea of universal human nature, has contributed to declining interest in literature courses.

3

Core human concerns—identity, civilization vs. barbarism, power vs. religion, and right vs. expedient—are not resolved in Shakespeare’s plays, but are presented as intractable and constitutive of the human experience.

4

Shakespeare’s genius is his ability to hold opposing moral positions without taking sides, allowing audiences to reflect rather than be indoctrinated.

5

Reading *Middlemarch* in later life offers new insights, showing how great literature evolves with the reader and provides companionship through wisdom and empathy.

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Introduction and Tour Context

Host Jack Wilson introduces the episode as a bonus installment ahead of the History of Literature podcast tour to England, where he and producer Emma will meet David Womersley and other literary scholars. He previews the dual interview with Womersley on Shakespeare and Jonathan Swift.

2:00
3 min

The Decline of Literary Study and the Rise of Theory

I think that it's not the whole explanation for why that's happened but a contributory course certainly was this hyper-skeptical theoretical encroachment on literary study.

Highlight
5:00
5 min

Human Nature: Universal or Socially Constructed?

We still have mothers who love children. We still have men and women falling in love. We still have jealousy.

Highlight
10:00
10 min

Shakespeare as a Thinker, Not a Teacher

Shakespeare himself was not undivided on these questions... he is right in the middle of these questions. But somehow, and this is where I think he is so distinctive, somehow does not feel obliged to take a side.

Highlight
20:00
20 min

The Perennial Question: Right vs. Expedient

In the case of King Lear, it's a vicious flexibility that allows people to be treated as just tools or expedients or means to an end. But in Measure for Measure, treating people like a means to an end actually produces a kind of relaxation, a moral relaxation that is helpful.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
I find that she, George Eliot, manages to sympathize or make sympathetic almost everyone in that novel... we can sort of figure out why they deserve our attention and our sympathy.
Ramie Targoff45:42
Viral: 95.0
Her intelligence and just her presence kind of presiding over this work... being in her intelligence for that period while you're reading it is a very uplifting feeling.
Ramie Targoff47:06
Viral: 93.0
In the case of King Lear, it's a vicious flexibility that allows people to be treated as just tools or expedients or means to an end. But in Measure for Measure, treating people like a means to an end actually produces a kind of relaxation, a moral relaxation that is helpful.
David Womersley26:56
Viral: 92.0
Speakers

Host

Jack Wilson

Guests

David WomersleyRamie Targoff
Topics Discussed
Human Nature and Universality95%Shakespeare's Tragedies as Philosophical Inquiry92%Moral Philosophy in Literature90%The Role of Art in Society88%The Divine Right of Kings85%Theory in Literary Studies80%Civilization vs. Barbarism75%Identity and Self in Literature70%
People & Brands

Shakespeare

person

60xPositive

David Womersley

person

45xPositive

Jack Wilson

person

30xPositive

King Lear

other

18xNeutral

Measure for Measure

other

16xNeutral

Ramie Targoff

person

15xPositive

The History of Literature

media

12xPositive

Macbeth

other

12xNeutral

Middlemarch

other

10xNeutral

Cheez-It

brand

10xNeutral

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “798.5 Thinking Through Shakespeare (with David Womersley) | My Last Book with Ramie Targoff” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime