The Trump Administration vs. Smith College and The New York Times

The Brian Lehrer Show27mMay 7, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “The Trump Administration vs. Smith College and The New York Times” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

The Brian Lehrer Show examines two high-profile legal actions by the Trump administration targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives: a federal investigation into Smith College for admitting transgender women, and a lawsuit by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against The New York Times over its diversity hiring goals. Columbia Law Professor Suzanne Goldberg, a former federal civil rights official, critiques both actions as politically motivated, legally flawed, and part of a broader effort to undermine civil rights protections. She argues that the Smith College investigation misapplies Title IX, ignores real student harms, and is driven by political posturing rather than genuine civil rights enforcement. Similarly, she condemns the EEOC lawsuit as a distortion of Title VII, using diversity commitments as evidence of discrimination, while ignoring systemic inequities that justify proactive inclusion efforts. Goldberg emphasizes that civil rights laws are meant to protect all people, including marginalized groups, and warns that these actions threaten democratic norms by scapegoating transgender individuals and suppressing DEI progress. Listeners share personal perspectives, with some expressing concern over the erosion of women's colleges and others condemning the administration's anti-trans rhetoric and policies.

Key Takeaways
1

The Trump administration is using civil rights investigations and lawsuits to attack DEI policies, often misapplying laws like Title IX and Title VII.

2

The investigation into Smith College for admitting transgender women is legally questionable and appears politically driven, not based on actual student harm.

3

The EEOC lawsuit against The New York Times over diversity hiring goals misrepresents the law and undermines efforts to correct systemic inequities.

4

Civil rights laws are designed to protect all individuals, not just one group, and proactive diversity efforts are lawful and necessary.

5

These actions reflect a broader pattern of scapegoating marginalized communities, including transgender people and people of color, to advance political agendas.

Chapters
0:00
3 min

Introduction to the Trump Administration's Attack on DEI

Brian Lehrer introduces the episode, highlighting two recent actions by the Trump administration: a civil rights investigation into Smith College for admitting transgender students and an EEOC lawsuit against The New York Times over diversity hiring goals.

2:30
6 min

Smith College Investigation: A Misapplication of Title IX

This is a new contortion of Title IX. It's not about real harm to students. It's about political posturing.

Highlight
8:20
8 min

The Role of the Honorary Degree and Conservative Advocacy Groups

They filed a complaint based on a photo of an honorary degree, not on any student harm. That's how far this has gone.

Highlight
16:40
7 min

The New York Times EEOC Lawsuit and the Myth of 'Single Standard'

The government is trying to chill employers from saying they’re committed to diversity. That’s not illegal — it’s the point of civil rights laws.

Highlight
23:20
4 min

Closing: Scapegoating and the Threat to Democracy

This is not normal. Democracies don’t attack their members. And that is really, I think, all of our responsibility to be clear about.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
This is not normal. Democracies don’t attack their members. And that is really, I think, all of our responsibility to be clear about.
Suzanne Goldberg44:40
Viral: 95.0
They filed a complaint based on a photo of an honorary degree, not on any student harm. That's how far this has gone.
Suzanne Goldberg18:00
Viral: 90.0
The government is trying to chill employers from saying they’re committed to diversity. That’s not illegal — it’s the point of civil rights laws.
Suzanne Goldberg33:00
Viral: 88.0
Speakers

Host

Brian Lehrer

Guest

Suzanne Goldberg
Topics Discussed
Title IX and Transgender Rights95%Political Use of Civil Rights Laws92%Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in Higher Education90%Transgender Rights and Public Policy90%Employment Discrimination and Diversity Hiring88%Democratic Norms and Scapegoating87%Federal Civil Rights Enforcement85%Media and Representation75%
People & Brands

Trump Administration

organization

22xNegative

Suzanne Goldberg

person

15xPositive

The New York Times

organization

14xNeutral

Smith College

organization

12xNeutral

Title IX

other

11xNeutral

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

organization

10xNegative

Department of Education Office for Civil Rights

organization

9xNegative

Rachel Levine

person

8xPositive

Title VII

other

6xNeutral

Defending Education

organization

5xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “The Trump Administration vs. Smith College and The New York Times” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime