The Abortion Pill on SCOTUS’s Shadow Docket (with Mary Ziegler)

Stay Tuned with Preet11mMay 12, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “The Abortion Pill on SCOTUS’s Shadow Docket (with Mary Ziegler)” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this episode of Stay Tuned with Preet, host Preet Bharara is joined by Mary Ziegler, law professor at UC Davis and expert on reproductive rights law, to dissect the latest legal battle over mifepristone, the abortion pill, as it reaches the Supreme Court’s shadow docket. The discussion centers on a Louisiana-led lawsuit challenging the FDA’s 2023 decision to allow telehealth access to mifepristone, with the state arguing it undermines its sovereign authority and incurs public health costs. The Fifth Circuit issued a nationwide block on telehealth access, which the Supreme Court temporarily stayed—only for Justice Alito to extend the stay, signaling internal court division. Ziegler explains the complex standing arguments, the lack of conclusive evidence linking Louisiana’s costs to the FDA’s policy, and the broader political tension between conservative states and a seemingly inactive Trump-era FDA. She also highlights the surprising legal argument rooted in the 19th-century Comstock Act, which could criminalize mailing abortion medication—a claim that has drawn interest from Justices Alito and Thomas. The episode underscores how regulatory continuity, political will, and the shadow docket’s opacity are shaping one of the most consequential reproductive rights cases in years. Ziegler emphasizes that this is not a final decision but a preliminary injunction on the shadow docket, where the Court’s lack of transparency makes predicting outcomes nearly impossible. The episode reveals a deep institutional crisis: the FDA’s failure to conduct a promised safety study on mifepristone, despite repeated delays and political pressure, has empowered conservative states and activist groups to step in. This creates a paradox where the very agency meant to ensure drug safety is perceived as inactive, fueling legal challenges from both sides. The conversation ends with a warning: without clear, consistent regulatory oversight across administrations, Americans cannot rely on the safety of drugs like mifepristone, and the courts are left to resolve political disputes under the guise of legal procedure. The episode concludes with a call to action for listeners to support the podcast and stay informed through the Insider feed.

Key Takeaways
1

The Supreme Court’s shadow docket is being used to make high-stakes decisions on mifepristone access without full briefing or oral argument.

2

Louisiana’s standing to sue is contested—its claims of lost sovereignty and $80k–$90k in emergency care costs are legally weak and hard to trace to FDA policy.

3

The FDA under the Trump administration has delayed a promised safety study on mifepristone, fueling frustration among conservative states and activists.

4

The Comstock Act is being invoked as a potential legal basis to ban telehealth access to abortion pills—a radical argument gaining traction with conservative justices.

5

Regulatory continuity across administrations is eroding: a drug deemed safe today may not be safe tomorrow if the FDA fails to act, creating legal and public health uncertainty.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
1 min

Introduction to the Mifepristone Legal Battle

Preet Bharara introduces the episode and previews the discussion on the Supreme Court’s shadow docket case involving mifepristone, the abortion pill, with guest Mary Ziegler.

0:43
2 min

Louisiana’s Lawsuit and the Fifth Circuit’s Block

Ziegler explains how Louisiana sued the FDA over telehealth access to mifepristone, and how the Fifth Circuit issued a nationwide block, which the Supreme Court temporarily stayed.

2:30
3 min

Standing and the Legal Basis for the Lawsuit

The episode examines whether Louisiana has legal standing, focusing on claims of sovereignty and public health costs, and why the FDA and drug manufacturers dispute these arguments.

5:00
3 min

The FDA’s Delayed Safety Study and Political Fallout

This is one of the few scenarios where the FDA was not moving in that direction. And so we saw conservative states being unwilling to wait right for that kind of sudden shift.

Highlight
7:30
3 min

The Comstock Act and the Radical Legal Argument

Their argument is essentially that the FDA couldn't legally approve telehealth because there's a 19th century obscenity law that already makes it a crime to mail or receive abortion medication or paraphernalia.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
Their argument is essentially that the FDA couldn't legally approve telehealth because there's a 19th century obscenity law that already makes it a crime to mail or receive abortion medication or paraphernalia.
Mary Ziegler4:44
Viral: 90.0
Americans can't be secure that a drug found safe in one administration will be found safe in another because if the administration doesn't do that job, there now are going to be activist groups and states pushing the government to do that.
Mary Ziegler10:02
Viral: 88.0
This is one of the few scenarios where the FDA was not moving in that direction. And so we saw conservative states being unwilling to wait right for that kind of sudden shift.
Mary Ziegler10:13
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Host

Preet Bharara

Guest

Mary Ziegler
Topics Discussed
Supreme Court Shadow Docket95%Legal Challenges to Reproductive Rights92%Mifepristone Access and Telehealth90%Comstock Act and Abortion88%FDA Regulatory Authority85%Administrative Continuity and Policy Shifts82%State Standing in Federal Litigation80%Political Influence on Drug Regulation78%
People & Brands

Mifepristone

product

25xNeutral

FDA

organization

18xMixed

Supreme Court of the United States

other

15xNeutral

Louisiana

other

14xNegative

Mary Ziegler

person

12xPositive

Trump administration

organization

10xNegative

Preet Bharara

person

8xNeutral

Justice Alito

person

7xNeutral

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

other

6xNeutral

Comstock Act

other

5xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “The Abortion Pill on SCOTUS’s Shadow Docket (with Mary Ziegler)” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime