Bondi, Birthright & Conversion Therapy (with Dahlia Lithwick)

Stay Tuned with Preet12mApril 7, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Bondi, Birthright & Conversion Therapy (with Dahlia Lithwick)” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this episode of Stay Tuned with Preet, host Preet Bharara is joined by Dahlia Lithwick, senior editor at Slate and co-host of the Amicus podcast, to discuss two major Supreme Court issues: the controversial conversion therapy case from Colorado and the broader implications for birthright citizenship. The conversation centers on a 8-1 Supreme Court decision where Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson stands alone in dissent, arguing that the Court’s ruling in favor of a therapist’s First Amendment right to promote conversion therapy—despite its recognized harm—sets a dangerous precedent for vulnerable populations, particularly LGBTQ+ youth. The panel explores how the Court’s expansive interpretation of free speech, especially in professional contexts, undermines regulatory authority over licensed practitioners and could erode protections in medical, legal, and ethical domains. They contrast this with historical precedents like compelled speech in abortion counseling and professional licensing rules, emphasizing that not all speech is equally protected—especially when it comes to licensed professionals. The discussion also draws connections to the Court’s recent 6-3 decision upholding state bans on gender-affirming care for minors, framing both cases as part of a broader judicial trend targeting LGBTQ+ rights and medical autonomy. The hosts express concern that the Court’s approach prioritizes speech over well-being, especially for minors, and question whether the remedy of future malpractice lawsuits is sufficient when harm is already done.

Key Takeaways
1

The Supreme Court’s 8-1 decision in the Colorado conversion therapy case prioritizes free speech over public health, allowing licensed therapists to promote discredited and harmful practices.

2

Professional speech—especially in medicine and law—is already regulated; the idea that First Amendment rights should override licensing standards is a dangerous precedent.

3

This case is part of a larger pattern of rulings that undermine LGBTQ+ rights, including recent decisions restricting gender-affirming care for minors.

4

The Court’s use of speech rights as a 'crowbar' to challenge civil rights and medical regulations risks enabling harm under the guise of constitutional freedom.

5

Justice Jackson’s dissent warns of a 'parade of horribles'—real-world harms to vulnerable patients—that the majority fails to adequately consider.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
1 min

Introduction and Episode Overview

Preet Bharara introduces the episode, highlighting the guest Dahlia Lithwick and previewing the discussion on President Trump’s firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi, birthright citizenship, and the conversion therapy case before the Supreme Court.

0:59
4 min

The Conversion Therapy Case and the 8-1 Decision

This is another case about what standard should be used to evaluate a law. Is it strict scrutiny? Is it rational relationship? The case ends up being shockingly 8-1. Ketanji Brown Jackson ends up getting hung out to dry as the one.

Highlight
5:00
5 min

Free Speech vs. Professional Regulation

We have a longstanding set of rules that you may recall allow abortion providers to give speeches... that are not only not medically indicated, but that are in fact demonstrably false... those physicians can be compelled to give.

Highlight
10:00
2 min

Broader Implications: LGBTQ+ Rights and Judicial Trends

This is part of a kind of juggernaut where, you know, the court is one after another, it seems, going after, you know, vulnerable populations of LGBTQ kids.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
What if I'm a doctor and I believe that bleach will cure the flu, injections of bleach? And so I tell my patients, I think that this is how we should treat your flu. And then I inject them and they of course don't survive the injection of bleach. But that's my free speech right under this case.
Joyce Vance8:29
Viral: 92.0
This is more of the same, and it is going to redound to the profound, profound harm of kids seeking therapeutic counsel.
Ketanji Brown Jackson (via dissent summary)4:36
Viral: 88.0
The idea that like, oh, freedom for one group redounds to freedom for everybody and so more free speech shall flourish, like it only ever seems to come cut one way with this court.
Dahlia Lithwick10:44
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Host

Preet Bharara

Guest

Dahlia Lithwick
Topics Discussed
Conversion Therapy and First Amendment Rights95%LGBTQ+ Rights and Judicial Trends90%Professional Speech Regulation88%Medical Licensing and Ethical Standards85%Compelled Speech in Medicine80%Supreme Court Procedural Posture75%Malpractice and Legal Remedies70%Birthright Citizenship60%
People & Brands

Supreme Court

organization

18xNeutral

Dahlia Lithwick

person

15xPositive

Preet Bharara

person

12xNeutral

Ketanji Brown Jackson

person

10xPositive

Joyce Vance

person

8xPositive

Colorado

place

5xNeutral

Elena Kagan

person

4xPositive

Abortion Providers

organization

4xNeutral

Stay Tuned

media

3xPositive

Sonia Sotomayor

person

3xPositive

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Bondi, Birthright & Conversion Therapy (with Dahlia Lithwick)” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime