Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions

RNZ - All Programmes12mApril 7, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

The Supreme Court of New Zealand has quashed David Tamihere's 1990 convictions for the murders of two Swedish backpackers, Heidi Parkinen and Urban Hoglin, in a landmark decision after 36 years. The court found fundamental errors in the original trial, particularly the reliance on jailhouse snitch testimony—especially from Conchie Harris, who was later proven to have lied—and a significant shift in the Crown's case theory. While the conviction is annulled, the court has directed a retrial, leaving the decision to proceed with prosecution up to the Crown. The case has drawn national attention due to its long history, the potential for a miscarriage of justice, and the emotional toll on both the accused and the victims' families in Sweden. Investigative journalist Mike White, who has followed the case for decades, praised the Supreme Court’s thorough and decisive judgment, emphasizing that the case must now be retested before a jury to ensure fairness. The episode explores broader systemic issues in New Zealand’s criminal justice system, including recurring miscarriages of justice in high-profile cases like those of Arthur Alan Thomas, David Bain, and Alan Hall. White highlights how flawed investigative practices—such as overreliance on unreliable informants and shifting theories—can undermine the integrity of trials, even decades later. While the Crown faces difficult decisions about whether to pursue a retrial given the passage of time, witness unreliability, and the fact that Tamihere has already served 20 years, the judgment underscores the importance of accountability and due process. Ultimately, the decision reaffirms that justice must be re-examined when foundational errors are uncovered, regardless of how much time has passed.

Key Takeaways
1

The Supreme Court quashed David Tamihere's convictions due to fundamental errors, including reliance on a lying jailhouse snitch and a changed Crown theory.

2

A retrial is now possible but up to the Crown to decide—weighing justice, practicality, and the victims’ families’ need for answers.

3

The case highlights systemic flaws in New Zealand’s justice system, including overreliance on unreliable informants and shifting prosecution narratives.

4

Even after decades, the justice system must retest cases when core evidence is proven false or unreliable.

5

Tamihere’s innocence remains unproven; the retrial will determine whether he can be convicted again with new evidence.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Supreme Court Quashes Tamihere's Convictions

This is not the kind of thing that the Supreme Court does every day. Turn a controversial case on its head...

Highlight
2:00
3 min

The Role of Jailhouse Snitches and False Testimony

One of these jailhouse snitches... was found to have purged himself, to have lied at Tamahiri's trial.

Highlight
5:00
3 min

The Crown's Shifting Case Theory

The Crown has changed its theory about what happened... and so if it's so different, then this new evidence has to be tested in front of a jury.

Highlight
8:00
3 min

The Crown's Dilemma: Retrial or Closure?

The Crown must now decide whether to pursue a retrial, balancing justice for victims’ families, practical challenges of old evidence, and the fact that Tamihere has already served 20 years.

11:00
2 min

Systemic Failures and the Need for Accountability

The case is part of a broader pattern of miscarriages of justice in New Zealand, including cases like Arthur Alan Thomas and David Bain, underscoring the need for rigorous investigative standards.

High-Impact Quotes
I think today's judgment was absolutely the correct one... his case has enough concerns from an evidential point of view that it's important and good that it's going back to the court to be retested again.
Mike White12:16
Viral: 88.0
This is not the kind of thing that the Supreme Court does every day. Turn a controversial case on its head and this was a very strong judgment from the Supreme Court.
Mike White1:12
Viral: 85.0
The Crown has changed its theory about what happened... and so if it's so different, then this new evidence has to be tested in front of a jury.
Mike White3:52
Viral: 80.0
Speakers

Host

Neil

Guest

Mike White
Topics Discussed
miscarriage of justice95%jailhouse snitches90%supreme court decision88%evidence reliability85%retrial process82%criminal justice reform80%victims' families75%investigative journalism70%
People & Brands

David Tamihere

person

28xNeutral

Mike White

person

20xPositive

Neil

person

15xNeutral

Crown

organization

14xNeutral

Supreme Court of New Zealand

organization

12xPositive

Urban Hoglin

person

10xNeutral

Heidi Parkinen

person

10xNeutral

Court of Appeal

organization

8xNegative

Conchie Harris

person

6xNegative

Arthur Alan Thomas

person

3xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime