Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions” inside PodZeus.
The Supreme Court of New Zealand has quashed David Tamihere's 1990 convictions for the murders of two Swedish backpackers, Heidi Parkinen and Urban Hoglin, in a landmark decision after 36 years. The court found fundamental errors in the original trial, particularly the reliance on jailhouse snitch testimony—especially from Conchie Harris, who was later proven to have lied—and a significant shift in the Crown's case theory. While the conviction is annulled, the court has directed a retrial, leaving the decision to proceed with prosecution up to the Crown. The case has drawn national attention due to its long history, the potential for a miscarriage of justice, and the emotional toll on both the accused and the victims' families in Sweden. Investigative journalist Mike White, who has followed the case for decades, praised the Supreme Court’s thorough and decisive judgment, emphasizing that the case must now be retested before a jury to ensure fairness. The episode explores broader systemic issues in New Zealand’s criminal justice system, including recurring miscarriages of justice in high-profile cases like those of Arthur Alan Thomas, David Bain, and Alan Hall. White highlights how flawed investigative practices—such as overreliance on unreliable informants and shifting theories—can undermine the integrity of trials, even decades later. While the Crown faces difficult decisions about whether to pursue a retrial given the passage of time, witness unreliability, and the fact that Tamihere has already served 20 years, the judgment underscores the importance of accountability and due process. Ultimately, the decision reaffirms that justice must be re-examined when foundational errors are uncovered, regardless of how much time has passed.
The Supreme Court quashed David Tamihere's convictions due to fundamental errors, including reliance on a lying jailhouse snitch and a changed Crown theory.
A retrial is now possible but up to the Crown to decide—weighing justice, practicality, and the victims’ families’ need for answers.
The case highlights systemic flaws in New Zealand’s justice system, including overreliance on unreliable informants and shifting prosecution narratives.
Even after decades, the justice system must retest cases when core evidence is proven false or unreliable.
Tamihere’s innocence remains unproven; the retrial will determine whether he can be convicted again with new evidence.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Supreme Court Quashes Tamihere's Convictions
“This is not the kind of thing that the Supreme Court does every day. Turn a controversial case on its head...”
The Role of Jailhouse Snitches and False Testimony
“One of these jailhouse snitches... was found to have purged himself, to have lied at Tamahiri's trial.”
The Crown's Shifting Case Theory
“The Crown has changed its theory about what happened... and so if it's so different, then this new evidence has to be tested in front of a jury.”
The Crown's Dilemma: Retrial or Closure?
The Crown must now decide whether to pursue a retrial, balancing justice for victims’ families, practical challenges of old evidence, and the fact that Tamihere has already served 20 years.
Systemic Failures and the Need for Accountability
The case is part of a broader pattern of miscarriages of justice in New Zealand, including cases like Arthur Alan Thomas and David Bain, underscoring the need for rigorous investigative standards.
“I think today's judgment was absolutely the correct one... his case has enough concerns from an evidential point of view that it's important and good that it's going back to the court to be retested again.”
“This is not the kind of thing that the Supreme Court does every day. Turn a controversial case on its head and this was a very strong judgment from the Supreme Court.”
“The Crown has changed its theory about what happened... and so if it's so different, then this new evidence has to be tested in front of a jury.”
Host
Guest
David Tamihere
person
Mike White
person
Neil
person
Crown
organization
Supreme Court of New Zealand
organization
Urban Hoglin
person
Heidi Parkinen
person
Court of Appeal
organization
Conchie Harris
person
Arthur Alan Thomas
person
The pros and cons of single-sex state schools
RNZ - All Programmes • 11m • 4/7/2026
The Panel with Jo McCarroll and David Downs, Part 2
RNZ - All Programmes • 23m • 4/7/2026
Midweek - BSA extends reach, a bad week for Big Tech, breakfast with Tova and an easter chocolate ban
RNZ - All Programmes • 25m • 4/7/2026
Hannah Lillith Assadi discusses her exiled Palestinian father
RNZ - All Programmes • 20m • 4/7/2026
Former IEA boss warns how high oil might go
RNZ - All Programmes • 13m • 4/7/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Investigative journalist on quashing of David Tamihere's double-murder convictions” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
