Poisoning the Forest for the Trees

Reveal50mApril 25, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Poisoning the Forest for the Trees” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

This episode of Reveal investigates the widespread use of glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, across California's forests—particularly in the aftermath of devastating megafires like the Dixie and Park Fires. Reporter Nate Halverson uncovers how the U.S. Forest Service and private timber companies, including Sierra Pacific Industries, are spraying glyphosate on over 10,000 acres of public and private land to promote the growth of young trees by eliminating competing vegetation. Despite growing scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer and other health issues—backed by the WHO classifying it as a probable carcinogen—regulators continue to rely on a discredited 2000 scientific paper, the Williams et al. study, which was later retracted due to evidence of ghostwriting by Monsanto employees. The episode reveals how Monsanto orchestrated a decades-long campaign to manipulate scientific consensus, funding and shaping studies to falsely assert glyphosate's safety. This manipulation has had lasting consequences, influencing federal policy and enabling continued spraying in ecologically sensitive areas like Yosemite, Lake Tahoe, and Lassen National Forest. The story culminates in a broader critique of corporate influence on science and regulation, with Harvard professor Naomi Oreskes exposing how the same tactics used by the tobacco industry are now being deployed to protect toxic chemicals. The episode raises urgent questions about environmental justice, public health, and the integrity of scientific research in the face of powerful corporate interests. The episode also highlights personal stories from residents like Joe Van Meter, whose family-run resort in Northern California is surrounded by sprayed forest land, and who fears for his children’s health and the purity of their water supply. Despite the Forest Service’s claim that glyphosate use is safe when applied according to label instructions, evidence from worker exposure, contaminated water sources, and the retraction of a foundational study undermines that assurance. As the Supreme Court prepares to rule on whether victims can continue suing Roundup’s manufacturer, and as the federal government considers expanding glyphosate use under a controversial executive order, the episode argues that the real danger isn’t just the chemical—it’s the poisoned well of scientific trust that has allowed it to persist for decades.

Key Takeaways
1

Glyphosate use in California’s forests has quadrupled over the past 20 years, with over 270,000 pounds sprayed in 2023 alone—more than any previous year.

2

The U.S. Forest Service relies heavily on a discredited 2000 scientific paper (the Williams paper) to justify glyphosate safety, despite evidence that Monsanto ghostwrote it.

3

Monsanto orchestrated a decades-long campaign to manipulate scientific literature, paying scientists to publish studies that falsely claimed glyphosate was safe.

4

The Williams paper was retracted in 2025 after Harvard professor Naomi Oreskes exposed its fraudulent origins, revealing how corporate influence can corrupt scientific integrity.

5

Glyphosate spraying is being expanded near sensitive areas like Lake Tahoe, campgrounds, and water sources, despite health risks and community opposition.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
10 min

The Poisoned Well: Glyphosate’s Hidden Legacy

If this product was as safe as they said, then why did they feel they needed to manipulate the scientific literature?

Highlight
10:00
10 min

The Forests Are Burning—And So Are the Rules

Reporter Nate Halverson shares his personal journey into the Lassen National Forest, where he discovers that areas recovering from the Dixie and Park Fires are being sprayed with glyphosate. He documents the stark contrast between vibrant, green areas and dead, brown zones—evidence of herbicide use. His investigation reveals that the U.S. Forest Service and private timber companies are treating forests like croplands, using toxic chemicals to eliminate competition for young trees.

20:00
10 min

The Data That Broke the System

Halverson dives into California’s extensive pesticide records—over 5 million documents—revealing that glyphosate use in forests has surged to record levels. The data shows heavy spraying near major tourist destinations like Yosemite and Lake Tahoe. He partners with data expert Melissa Lewis to visualize the scale of use, exposing how the Forest Service’s recovery plans rely on chemical solutions despite ecological risks.

30:00
10 min

The Human Cost of Chemical Spraying

The episode centers on Joe Van Meter, a resident of Mill Creek, whose family resort lies in the path of glyphosate spraying. He voices deep concerns about water contamination, children’s health, and the loss of natural biodiversity. Despite supporting fire recovery efforts, he argues that reforestation can be done without toxic chemicals. Craig Thomas, a fire recovery expert, calls the Forest Service’s reliance on glyphosate an 'addiction' and advocates for manual clearing as a safer, more sustainable alternative.

40:00
20 min

The Ghostwriting Scandal That Shook Science

We're not claiming this paper being retracted proves that glyphosate is scary dangerous. What we're saying, it proves that Monsanto poisoned the well of scientific debate.

Highlight
High-Impact Quotes
If this product was as safe as they said, then why did they feel they needed to manipulate the scientific literature?
Naomi Oreskes40:02
Viral: 92.0
We're not claiming this paper being retracted proves that glyphosate is scary dangerous. What we're saying, it proves that Monsanto poisoned the well of scientific debate.
Naomi Oreskes43:33
Viral: 90.0
They're addicted to herbicide use and glyphosate. We need to get them into rehab.
Craig Thomas23:16
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Host

Al Edson

Guests

Nate HalversonJoe Van MeterCraig ThomasNaomi Oreskes
Topics Discussed
Glyphosate Safety and Health Risks95%Corporate Influence on Science92%Environmental Justice and Public Lands88%Scientific Integrity and Retractions87%Forest Fire Recovery and Reforestation85%Legal Battles and Corporate Liability83%Chemical Spraying in Ecosystems80%Regulatory Capture and Government Accountability78%
People & Brands

Glyphosate

other

42xNegative

Roundup

product

38xNegative

Monsanto

organization

35xNeutral

U.S. Forest Service

organization

30xNegative

Nate Halverson

person

25xPositive

Naomi Oreskes

person

18xPositive

Joe Van Meter

person

15xNeutral

Williams Paper

other

15xNeutral

Lassen National Forest

place

12xNeutral

Bayer

organization

12xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Poisoning the Forest for the Trees” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime