Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of Columbia Energy Exchange, Jason Bordoff sits down with Daleep Singh, former Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics and current Vice Chair and Chief Global Economist at PGM, to discuss the urgent need for a structured U.S. industrial policy playbook. Singh argues that the era of market fundamentalism is over, and that targeted, disciplined government intervention is now essential to address market failures in critical sectors like clean energy, critical minerals, and advanced technology. Drawing on historical examples like DARPA and Operation Warp Speed, he emphasizes that successful industrial policy must be mission-driven, time-bound, and grounded in clear strategic objectives. He critiques the current ad-hoc nature of U.S. economic statecraft—encompassing tariffs, sanctions, and subsidies—and calls for a formal doctrine, institutional mechanisms like a sovereign wealth fund, and greater transparency to ensure accountability and long-term competitiveness. Singh also warns against the overuse of coercive tools like sanctions, which risk eroding the global dominance of the U.S. dollar and weakening international alliances. He advocates for a balanced approach that combines positive tools—like long-term investment vehicles and public-private partnerships—with strategic controls to counter China’s state-driven economic model, especially its use of overcapacity to undercut global competitors. The conversation underscores the need for a new framework that aligns economic, national, and energy security in an era of geopolitical fragmentation and technological competition.
Industrial policy must be mission-driven, time-bound, and grounded in a theory of market failure to avoid creating monopolies or permanent dependence on public support.
The U.S. needs a formal doctrine for economic statecraft—sanctions, tariffs, export controls—to prevent overuse and maintain global credibility and alliance cohesion.
A sovereign wealth fund or strategic investment vehicle could help the U.S. deploy patient capital for long-term, high-risk innovations like fusion, advanced geothermal, and neuromorphic computing.
China’s overcapacity in clean energy and critical minerals is not just a supply issue but a strategic weapon designed to flood markets, undercut competitors, and distort global trade.
The U.S. must balance domestic production incentives with international partnerships and targeted tariffs to ensure investments are not undermined by unfair competition.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
The End of Market Fundamentalism
“I think the premise of industrial policy, you know, by the time I came back into government at the White House, I had already come to the conclusion that, look, market failures absolutely exist. I'd seen them firsthand in the private sector and the public sector.”
The Case for a Frameworked Industrial Policy
“You know, I don't think the goal of any of these interventions should be permanent dependence on public support. The government's role, I think, should shrink as private capital scales up and markets mature.”
The Rise of Economic Statecraft and Its Risks
“The more you use sanctions, the more resistance will build. And so, of course, if you want to go maximalist, you can extract concessions... but there is a long-term cost you are borrowing from the future.”
China’s Overcapacity as a Strategic Weapon
“China is flooding strategic sectors with supply well beyond what global demand can plausibly absorb. And therefore, it's wiping out the competition.”
Building a New U.S. Economic Security Architecture
Singh advocates for a sovereign wealth fund, strategic stockpiles, and public-private partnerships to mobilize long-term capital. He emphasizes the need for collaboration across government, industry, and academia to rebuild resilient, innovative supply chains.
“The more you use sanctions, the more resistance will build. And so, of course, if you want to go maximalist, you can extract concessions... but there is a long-term cost you are borrowing from the future.”
“China is flooding strategic sectors with supply well beyond what global demand can plausibly absorb. And therefore, it's wiping out the competition.”
“We have the most to lose. It undermines, erodes the strength of the dollar in the long term or other countries de-risk and reduce their exposure to our coercive force.”
Host
Guest
China
place
Biden administration
organization
Russia
place
Daleep Singh
person
Trump administration
organization
G7
organization
Jason Bordoff
person
Inflation Reduction Act
other
CHIPS Act
other
G20
organization
Iran Conflict Brief: The War's Lasting Impact on Gulf States
Columbia Energy Exchange • 29m • 4/1/2026
Iran Conflict Brief: Ali Ansari on What's Going on Inside Iran
Columbia Energy Exchange • 29m • 4/6/2026
Dan Steingart on Battery Innovation and the Future of Energy Storage
Columbia Energy Exchange • 48m • 4/7/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Daleep Singh on the Need for a US Industrial Policy Playbook” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
