Using Virtual Fence after a Wildfire - A Producer's Perspective
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Using Virtual Fence after a Wildfire - A Producer's Perspective” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of UNL BeefWatch, host Aaron Berger speaks with Jesse Jarvis, a third-generation rancher from southern Idaho, about her family's innovative use of virtual fencing technology following devastating wildfires in 2024. After two fires burned through their primary winter grazing allotments—both of which were federally managed and ecologically sensitive—Jarvis and her family faced the urgent challenge of finding alternative grazing options without violating environmental protections or incurring prohibitive fence installation costs. With federal land managers at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) offering support and guidance, they implemented Vence technology virtual fencing, leveraging a borrowed tower and collars to create temporary digital boundaries. The process, which included a four-day training period for the cattle, proved highly effective, allowing them to graze unburned portions of their permits without permanent infrastructure. The solution saved an estimated $10,000 compared to feeding hay and avoided tens of thousands in fence costs. Jarvis shares that the technology not only solved an immediate crisis but also revealed long-term benefits, including data-driven grazing insights, herd behavior tracking, and potential for future rotational grazing strategies. She emphasizes the importance of BLM collaboration and cautions that virtual fencing is best suited for single-herd operations due to challenges in managing mixed herds on public lands. The episode underscores the growing role of precision agriculture tools in climate-resilient ranching, particularly in fire-prone Western regions. Jarvis advocates for broader adoption of virtual fencing among producers facing similar post-wildfire challenges, noting its potential to preserve genetic herds, reduce culling, and support sustainable land use. She also highlights the need for careful planning, especially around training, boundary placement, and integration with existing management systems. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s ongoing research and resource tools are recommended for producers exploring virtual fencing. Overall, the story illustrates how adversity can spark innovation, turning a crisis into a catalyst for modernizing ranching practices through technology and partnership.
Virtual fencing enabled immediate post-wildfire grazing on federally managed land without permanent fencing, saving ~$10,000 compared to hay feeding.
A four-day training period with a phased approach (shock zone → tone → boundary reduction) is essential for successful cattle adaptation.
BLM support, including loaned towers, was critical to the project’s success and demonstrated federal agencies’ willingness to pilot innovative solutions.
Virtual fencing is most effective for single-herd operations; it’s less suitable for shared public lands where herd separation is needed.
Data from collars offers valuable insights into individual animal movement, herd grouping, and nighttime behavior, enabling smarter grazing decisions.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introduction to Virtual Fence After Wildfire
Host Aaron Berger introduces the episode’s focus: using virtual fencing as a post-wildfire grazing solution for ranchers managing federal land leases. He welcomes Jesse Jarvis, a third-generation Idaho rancher, to discuss her family’s experience.
Ranch Background and Family Legacy
Jesse Jarvis shares her journey from aspiring anesthesiologist to rancher, detailing her family’s 80-year history in southern Idaho, their dual private and federal land operations, and how she transitioned from city life back to ranching.
Wildfire Impact and Grazing Crisis
“We had nowhere to run these animals over the winter. This area with the shape of that fire, it burnt probably more than half of that allotment. But again, this is another area where the Oregon Trail runs through.”
Exploring Virtual Fencing as a Solution
“We had a very short window of time to make a decision as to what we were going to do and how we were going to move forward in order to be able to continue to graze those areas.”
Implementation and Training Process
“It really does only take about 60 seconds of cow to put that collar on. I thought you are out of your mind. Once again, I was wrong.”
“It's not a matter of if you're going to have a fire, it's when you're going to have a fire.”
“We had nowhere to run these animals over the winter. This area with the shape of that fire, it burnt probably more than half of that allotment.”
“For us specifically with 150 cows, that collar is $50... We would have been looking at about $18,000 for that initial year. So it came in about $10,000 cheaper than feeding hay.”
Host
Guest
Jesse Jarvis
person
Bureau of Land Management
organization
Vence
brand
Aaron Berger
person
Idaho
other
2024 wildfires
other
UNL BeefWatch
media
Oregon Trail
place
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
organization
Nebraska
other
Managing Burned Pastures After a Wildfire - How to Graze
UNL BeefWatch • 27m • 3/31/2026
Why Storage, Not Age, Determines Hay Quality
UNL BeefWatch • 13m • 4/8/2026
Nebraska Cattle Health Update: Bovine Theileriosis and the Asian Longhorned Tick
UNL BeefWatch • 14m • 4/10/2026
Leveraging Summer Annual Forages in Today’s High Cattle Markets
UNL BeefWatch • 10m • 4/15/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Using Virtual Fence after a Wildfire - A Producer's Perspective” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
