EP#78 Richard Ross & Mike Kingsella | The Bizarre Push To Kill Build-To-Rent

The Rent Roll with Jay Parsons1h 17mApril 2, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “EP#78 Richard Ross & Mike Kingsella | The Bizarre Push To Kill Build-To-Rent” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

A seismic policy shift in Washington, D.C., is threatening to collapse the build-to-rent (BTR) housing market—a sector that has quietly added 50,000 new rental units annually—by mandating that developers with more than 350 units sell their properties within seven years. This provision, tucked into the 21st Century Road to Housing Act, has already frozen capital flows, halted construction, and created a crisis of uncertainty across the industry. The legislation, pushed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and backed by a bipartisan majority, targets BTR and single-family rentals under the false premise that institutional investors are crowding out homeowners. But as Richard Ross of Quinn Residences reveals, the real victims are families who need affordable, family-sized rental homes—especially those who can’t afford down payments or credit hurdles. The policy is not only regressive but economically nonsensical: it ignores that BTR developers are not home builders, that townhomes are not easily convertible to condos, and that forcing evictions after seven years would displace renters who rely on these communities. Meanwhile, Senator Brian Schatz’s powerful floor speech exposed the bill’s absurdity, calling it 'positively Soviet'—a damning indictment of a law that punishes supply creation. With the House now holding the bill, and a growing coalition of pro-housing advocates pushing back, the outcome could redefine America’s housing future. The stakes?

Key Takeaways
1

The 7-year disposition rule in Section 901 of the Road to Housing Act will freeze BTR development by making 10-year financing incompatible with forced sales.

2

BTR developers are not home builders—converting rental communities to condos is economically and logistically impossible for most projects.

3

One-third of BTR residents are renters by choice, valuing flexibility and maintenance-free living, not homeownership.

4

The legislation creates a 'regressive policy' that targets renters who can't afford down payments, despite their need for affordable housing.

5

Even if the bill is altered, uncertainty will persist for months or years, deterring capital from entering the market.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
10 min

The BTR Market Is Frozen by a Single Law

The BTR pipeline is pretty much shut down. And again, that's about 50,000 units per year.

Highlight
10:00
10 min

How the Senate Bill Hijacked Pro-Housing Progress

Parsons traces the origin of the controversial Section 901 to a presidential tweet calling for a ban on 'big investors' buying homes. Though initially exempted, BTR was later included by Senator Elizabeth Warren, who attached it to a pro-housing bill. The result? A bill that reduces supply instead of increasing it.

20:00
10 min

Senator Schatz’s Floor Speech: A Wake-Up Call

This is positively Soviet. Like, it is arbitrary. We have decided... Owning is good. Renting is bad. We have decided triplexes are fine, duplexes are not.

Highlight
30:00
10 min

Why the Seven-Year Rule Is a Development Killer

If you put a seven-year clock, it takes about three years to develop and stabilize a community. So now you have four years left and maybe I do have a five-year loan or a 10-year loan. So that's an issue.

Highlight
40:00
10 min

The Myth of the 'For Sale' Switch

Ross dismantles the idea that BTR developers could simply switch to building for-sale homes. The product, financing, zoning, and design are all fundamentally different. A single-parcel BTR community cannot be converted into condos without massive legal and financial hurdles.

High-Impact Quotes
This is positively Soviet. Like, it is arbitrary. We have decided... Owning is good. Renting is bad. We have decided triplexes are fine, duplexes are not.
Senator Brian Schatz14:32
Viral: 92.0
Congress is wading into issues pertaining to land use, to zoning, to capital markets, to tax treatment, even in the case of this, a de facto federal ban and forced sell requirement for a very specific multifamily asset class.
Mike Kingsella75:46
Viral: 88.0
the BTR pipeline is pretty much shut down. And again, that's about 50 ,000 units per
Jay Parsons6:23
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Host

Jay Parsons

Guests

Richard RossMike Kingsella
Topics Discussed
build to rent95%housing supply90%rental housing policy88%section 90185%bipartisan housing legislation80%investor regulation75%affordable housing70%renter demographics65%
People & Brands

Richard Ross

person

15xPositive

Elizabeth Warren

person

14xNegative

Jay Parsons

person

12xNeutral

21st Century Road to Housing Act

other

10xNegative

Quinn Residences

organization

9xPositive

Mike Kingsella

person

8xPositive

Up for Growth

organization

6xPositive

Brian Schatz

person

5xPositive

John Burns Research and Consulting

organization

4xNeutral

Funnel

organization

3xNeutral

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “EP#78 Richard Ross & Mike Kingsella | The Bizarre Push To Kill Build-To-Rent” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime