Gettin’ Wonky on the Unitary Executive | Interview: Charlie Cooke

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg1h 18mMay 4, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Gettin’ Wonky on the Unitary Executive | Interview: Charlie Cooke” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this episode of The Remnant, Jonah Goldberg engages in a wide-ranging conversation with Charlie Cooke, senior editor at National Review and host of the Charles Cook podcast. The discussion begins with a lighthearted exchange about Florida politics, particularly Ron DeSantis’s handling of the pandemic and his controversial push to eliminate vaccine mandates—arguments that Cooke critiques as a category error, distinguishing between the novel context of the COVID-19 pandemic and established vaccines like those for polio. The conversation then pivots to a deep dive into the unitary executive theory, with Cooke defending the constitutional principle that the president must have full control over the executive branch, while Goldberg expresses growing discomfort with its implications, especially regarding independent agencies like the Federal Reserve. They debate the originalist basis of the theory, the practical necessity of independent institutions, and the dangers of both over-centralization and institutional overreach. The dialogue expands into broader ideological territory, with Cooke critiquing the rise of illiberalism on the right—particularly post-liberal integralism and nationalist movements—arguing that they pose a greater threat to American conservatism than left-wing policies. Goldberg counters that while he agrees with many of Cooke’s critiques, he remains more alarmed by the prospect of a Jacobin-style Democratic Party gaining unchecked power, especially through court packing. The episode concludes with a reflection on intellectual integrity, the dangers of ideological conformity, and the importance of maintaining principled discourse even when disagreeing with allies. The tone is candid, self-aware, and deeply committed to the idea that truth and consistency matter more than tribal loyalty.

Key Takeaways
1

Distinguish between novel public health emergencies (like COVID-19) and established vaccines (like polio) when evaluating mandates.

2

The unitary executive theory asserts that the president must have full control over the executive branch, but its application to independent agencies like the Federal Reserve remains controversial.

3

Illiberalism on the right—especially nationalist, anti-institutional movements—poses a greater threat to authentic conservatism than left-wing policies.

4

Intellectual consistency matters: changing positions on major issues should be accompanied by clear, principled explanations, not just political convenience.

5

The real danger to democracy may not be one party’s bad policies, but the erosion of institutional norms—especially Supreme Court packing.

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Sponsor: Fingerhouse Home Building

A promotional segment for Fingerhouse, a homebuilding company offering a streamlined, one-stop service to reduce stress and cost in building a custom home.

1:50
3 min

DeSantis, COVID, and the Vaccine Mandate Debate

I don't get why this is a priority for anybody. Yeah, I mean, I don't know if it is, but if it is, it's bad.

Highlight
5:00
5 min

The Unitary Executive Theory: Origins and Debate

The biggest argument against it is practical. And I don't buy these arguments. But the strong argument against it is, for example, with the Federal Reserve.

Highlight
10:00
10 min

Originalism vs. Pragmatism: The Constitution in Practice

I just don't see that as laid out from what I've read about what the founders intended for the position.

Highlight
20:00
15 min

Progressivism, the Federal Reserve, and the 1619 Project

The conversation shifts to Clarence Thomas’s critique of progressivism, with Cooke arguing that the progressive era’s institutional innovations—like the Federal Reserve—are incompatible with constitutional originalism, while Goldberg questions the apocalyptic framing.

High-Impact Quotes
If the Supreme Court were packed, that would break the rule of law. And I don't know if you can go back.
Jonah Goldberg54:56
Viral: 90.0
The person you're hurting is you. So if you love Trump so much that you are willing to outsource your brain and your soul to him... then you're not sticking it to anyone except yourself.
Jonah Goldberg70:39
Viral: 88.0
The tumor is scarier in terms of what it means for the health of conservatism than the threat of, you know, the left.
Jonah Goldberg45:34
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Host

Jonah Goldberg

Guest

Charlie Cooke
Topics Discussed
unitary executive theory95%conservatism and classical liberalism92%illiberalism on the right90%constitutional originalism88%court packing and judicial independence87%vaccine mandates and public health policy85%intellectual integrity in politics83%Federal Reserve and institutional independence80%
People & Brands

Jonah Goldberg

person

20xPositive

Charlie Cooke

person

15xPositive

Donald Trump

person

12xMixed

Ron DeSantis

person

8xMixed

Clarence Thomas

person

7xPositive

Federal Reserve

organization

6xNeutral

National Review

organization

6xPositive

Woodrow Wilson

person

5xNegative

1619 Project

organization

4xNegative

Orbanism

other

4xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Gettin’ Wonky on the Unitary Executive | Interview: Charlie Cooke” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime