Taking 11 years of income from £100k investments - here’s what’s left
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Taking 11 years of income from £100k investments - here’s what’s left” inside PodZeus.
This episode of The Personal Investor Podcast examines the financial outcomes for the first cohort of retirees who took advantage of the 2015 pension freedoms in the UK. Host Ed Monk and Fidelity Investment Director Tom Stevenson analyze what would have happened to a £100,000 retirement pot invested in global shares or a 60-40 shares-bonds mix, with annual withdrawals of 4% or 7% adjusted for inflation. Despite a volatile start—particularly a 20% market drop in the first year—investors would have ended up with £264,000 at 4% withdrawals in equities, and £108,000 in the 60-40 portfolio. The results highlight the power of long-term compounding and the importance of staying the course through market downturns. The discussion also underscores the psychological challenge of sequencing risk—the timing of returns—and the value of maintaining a cash buffer to avoid panic-driven decisions like selling low during crashes. While annuities remain a viable option, the flexibility of drawdown strategies has proven highly beneficial for early adopters. Key takeaways include the importance of a long-term investment horizon, the critical role of emotional discipline in retirement planning, and the strategic use of cash reserves to weather market volatility. The episode concludes with a reminder that while past performance is not indicative of future results, the 11-year period since 2015 has been exceptionally favorable for retirees choosing to draw income from their investments. The host also promotes Fidelity’s free newsletters for ongoing investment insights.
A £100,000 retirement pot invested in global shares with 4% annual withdrawals (inflation-linked) would have grown to £264,000 after 11 years.
Even with 7% annual withdrawals, a 60-40 shares-bonds portfolio still left £108,000, demonstrating resilience and long-term growth.
Market volatility early in retirement—such as a 20% drop in year one—can be psychologically devastating, but staying the course leads to recovery and growth.
Sequencing risk is critical: losses early in retirement can reduce final pot size by up to 25% compared to gains early.
Maintaining a 1–2 year cash buffer can prevent panic selling and allow investors to weather market downturns without disrupting their investment strategy.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introduction: The 2015 Pension Freedoms Cohort
Ed Monk introduces the episode’s focus on retirees who began drawing income from their pensions in 2015, following the introduction of pension freedoms by Chancellor George Osborne. The goal is to assess how their investments have fared over 11 years.
The 2015 Pension Freedoms: A Game-Changer
Tom Stevenson explains how pension freedoms allowed retirees to choose between buying annuities or drawing income from their investments, replacing a rigid system with greater flexibility and personal responsibility.
The 4% Rule and Its Real-World Performance
“After 11 years of taking income from that pot, which means they have 11 fewer years to pay for of their retirement, they would have far more than twice as much money left now as they started with.”
Higher Withdrawals and the 60-40 Portfolio
“The 60-40 does give you a lower end pot. But you mentioned the volatility there and I think that's really important... because if the value of that pot were to diminish sharply, that is extremely concerning.”
Sequencing Risk and the Psychology of Market Crashes
“It would have been so easy to panic in that situation and not stay the course. But of course, in the fullness of time, all those losses were recovered and much, much more.”
“If you have your losses at the beginning of your period, and actually this period that we're discussing here is one of those situations where the first year was very poor, it actually reduces... the investor who had the losses at the beginning of the period ended up with a pot at the end 25% lower.”
“After 11 years of taking income from that pot, which means they have 11 fewer years to pay for of their retirement, they would have far more than twice as much money left now as they started with.”
“The worst thing that you could do is to see the value of your pot diminished by 20 percent... and then buy an annuity when the market is 20% lower.”
Host
Guest
Tom Stevenson
person
Ed Monk
person
60-40 Portfolio
other
Annuity
other
Fidelity
organization
Pension Freedoms
other
Global Shares
other
George Osborne
person
UK Stock Market
other
COVID-19
other
Who counts as rich? What frozen tax limits are costing you
The Personal Investor • 14m • 3/31/2026
Smart investors use these investments for income - here’s how
The Personal Investor • 21m • 4/8/2026
The biggest questions investors need answers to now
The Personal Investor • 40m • 4/9/2026
5 essential checks to make for the new tax year
The Personal Investor • 19m • 4/15/2026
How - and when - should you take tax-free cash from your pension?
The Personal Investor • 21m • 4/17/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Taking 11 years of income from £100k investments - here’s what’s left” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime