SCOTUS Profoundly Changed Elections—Mid-Vote! (w/ Kate Shaw)
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “SCOTUS Profoundly Changed Elections—Mid-Vote! (w/ Kate Shaw)” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of The Bulwark, host Sarah Longwell is joined by legal expert Kate Shaw to dissect the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Calais, a landmark decision that significantly undermines the Voting Rights Act. The Court ruled that using race to create a second majority-Black congressional district in Louisiana violated the Constitution's principle of racial neutrality, effectively invalidating a key mechanism for ensuring minority voting power. Shaw explains how this decision is part of a broader, decade-long dismantling of the Voting Rights Act, beginning with Shelby County (2013) and continuing through Brnovich (2022), and now culminating in a radical interpretation of constitutional colorblindness. She critiques the conservative legal theory that government must never consider race—even to remedy past discrimination—arguing it contradicts the original intent of the 14th and 15th Amendments. Justice Elena Kagan’s fiery dissent emphasizes the historical significance of the Voting Rights Act and asserts that only Congress, not the Court, has the authority to deem it obsolete. The episode also touches on shifting political attitudes, noting that the Voting Rights Act was once a bipartisan priority, now a flashpoint in a deeply polarized era.
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Calais effectively invalidates race-conscious redistricting to protect minority voting power, marking a major blow to the Voting Rights Act.
The Court’s 'colorblind' constitutional theory contradicts the original intent of the 14th and 15th Amendments, which were designed to address racial inequality through targeted remedies.
The decision reflects a broader conservative legal philosophy that claims racial discrimination no longer exists, despite evidence of systemic inequities.
Justice Kagan’s dissent powerfully argues that only Congress—not the Court—has the authority to determine whether the Voting Rights Act remains necessary.
The shift from bipartisan support for the Voting Rights Act (e.g., George W. Bush’s reauthorization) to a 6-3 conservative consensus underscores the deep politicization of civil rights law.
Introducing Kate Shaw and the Supreme Court Ruling
Sarah Longwell introduces Kate Shaw, a legal expert with deep experience in constitutional law and the Voting Rights Act, and sets the stage for a discussion on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Louisiana v. Calais.
The Louisiana v. Calais Case and the Court's Decision
“The court said that using race to create a second majority Black district violated the Constitution because the Constitution doesn't let you essentially think about race in that way.”
The Conservative Legal Theory of 'Colorblindness'
“The Constitution is fundamentally and so we're not going to allow government to say, oh, we have a benign reason for using race.”
Historical and Constitutional Contradictions
“It's hard for me to sort of get my head around how originalists say the meaning of those amendments has changed because circumstances have changed.”
Kagan’s Dissent and the Future of Civil Rights Law
“Only they have the right to say it is no longer needed, not the members of this court.”
“Only they have the right to say it is no longer needed, not the members of this court.”
“I dissent because the court's decision will set back the foundational right Congress granted of racial equality and electoral opportunity.”
“The VRA, quote, was born of the literal blood of union soldiers and civil rights marchers.”
Host
Guest
Voting Rights Act
other
Kate Shaw
person
Sarah Longwell
person
Louisiana v. Calais
other
Elena Kagan
person
Shelby County v. Holder
other
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
other
Samuel Alito
person
Southern Poverty Law Center
organization
Northwestern University Law School
organization
Trump & Hegseth Are Increasingly Delusional on Hormuz; TACO Incoming?
The Bulwark • 19m • 3/31/2026
Kristi Noem's Husband Isn’t the Problem
The Bulwark • 36m • 3/31/2026
Reporters Now Need Escorts to Do Their Jobs at the Pentagon (w/ Elliot Williams)
The Bulwark • 22m • 4/1/2026
Possible Ground Troops in Iran, Trump Speech Preview and The Slow-Motion Destruction of NATO | Command Post
The Bulwark • 19m • 4/1/2026
Josh Barro and Paige Cognetti: The World Is Going to Blame Trump
The Bulwark • 10m • 4/1/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “SCOTUS Profoundly Changed Elections—Mid-Vote! (w/ Kate Shaw)” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
