Ep. 269: Is free speech declining worldwide?
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Ep. 269: Is free speech declining worldwide?” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of So to Speak, host Nico Perino explores the global decline of free speech with co-authors Yakub Mushengama and Jeff Kossef, whose new book, 'The Future of Free Speech, Reversing the Global Decline of Democracy's Most Essential Freedom,' argues that democratic societies are experiencing a 'free speech recession.' Despite strong abstract support for free expression, public willingness to protect it erodes when it comes to controversial topics like religious criticism, political dissent, and especially generative AI. The hosts examine how governments and tech platforms are increasingly restricting speech under the guise of combating misinformation, hate speech, and protecting children, with Europe’s Digital Services Act and similar laws raising concerns about overreach. They highlight how authoritarian states like Russia and China are emulating democratic nations’ regulatory models, creating dangerous parallels. Yet, the episode also offers hope through solutions like Taiwan’s model of radical transparency, decentralized platforms, community-driven fact-checking, and anti-SLAPP laws, emphasizing that principled, consistent defense of free speech—even when politically inconvenient—is essential to preserving democracy.
Free speech is in global decline, with 5.8 billion people facing increased restrictions in just 10 years.
Public support for free speech collapses when it comes to controversial topics like religion, minorities, and AI-generated content.
Governments and platforms are using 'saving children' and 'misinformation' as justifications for speech restrictions, often undermining constitutional principles.
Authoritarian states are copying democratic nations' censorship models, creating dangerous convergence in free speech policies.
Taiwan’s approach of radical transparency and community fact-checking offers a promising alternative to top-down regulation.
…and 1 more takeaway available in PodZeus
The Global Free Speech Recession
“Around the world, we see relatively strong support for free speech in the abstract, but collapsing support when it becomes specific about, you know, should you have a right to offend minorities, say something controversial about religion, insult the national flag, and perhaps most worryingly, like extremely low support for free speech when it comes to generative AI.”
The Rise of Speech Restrictions in Democracies
The discussion shifts to how democracies are adopting censorship tools under the guise of combating misinformation, hate speech, and protecting children. The hosts analyze the EU’s Digital Services Act and the U.S. legislative push for laws like the Health Misinformation Act, warning that granting unelected officials power to define 'misinformation' is a dangerous precedent.
The Role of Technology and AI in the Free Speech Crisis
“What if AI was having a tangible, measurable effect on elections? Would that justify regulating it? I think that would be more dangerous. You think? Yeah, absolutely. Because then you have government putting its thumb on the scale of what the outcome would be.”
Authoritarian Models and Democratic Convergence
“In 2017, Germany pioneered a law that said if social media companies with two million daily users did not remove manifest illegal content within 24 hours, they risked a fine of up to 50 million euros. That was essentially a response to the refugee crisis... Within a couple of years, we saw that Russia, Venezuela, Belarus, Honduras, Egypt had adopted similar laws.”
Solutions and Hope: Taiwan’s Radical Transparency Model
“They went down a path of radical transparency where they said, you know, we're going to rather than tell people what to think, we're going to be transparent and build trust and give them as much information as we can.”
“What if AI was having a tangible, measurable effect on elections? Would that justify regulating it? I think that would be more dangerous. You think? Yeah, absolutely. Because then you have government putting its thumb on the scale of what the outcome would be.”
“In 2017, Germany pioneered a law that said if social media companies with two million daily users did not remove manifest illegal content within 24 hours, they risked a fine of up to 50 million euros. That was essentially a response to the refugee crisis... Within a couple of years, we saw that Russia, Venezuela, Belarus, Honduras, Egypt had adopted similar laws.”
“Around the world, we see relatively strong support for free speech in the abstract, but collapsing support when it becomes specific about, you know, should you have a right to offend minorities, say something controversial about religion, insult the national flag, and perhaps most worryingly, like extremely low support for free speech when it comes to generative AI.”
Host
Guests
Jeff Kossef
person
Yakub Mushengama
person
Nico Perino
person
The Future of Free Speech
organization
European Union
organization
Taiwan
place
FIRE
organization
Russia
place
China
place
Germany
place
Ep. 267: Social media = cigarettes?
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast • 59m • 4/1/2026
Ep. 268: News and misinformation in early America
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast • 56m • 4/3/2026
Ep. 270: The fight for privacy and free speech in the surveillance age
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast • 1h 15m • 4/23/2026
FIRE Reacts: Comey, Kimmel, ABC & the FCC
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast • 53m • 4/29/2026
Ep. 271: Minecraft, censorship, and threats to press freedom with Clayton Weimers
So to Speak: The Free Speech Podcast • 1h 3m • 4/30/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Ep. 269: Is free speech declining worldwide?” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime