Tariffs: SCOTUS Decision in Learning Resources, Refunds and Next Steps
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Tariffs: SCOTUS Decision in Learning Resources, Refunds and Next Steps” inside PodZeus.
This episode of S&C Critical Insights examines the aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in *Learning Resources*, which ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA) did not authorize the Trump administration’s use of tariffs. The decision invalidated IEPA-based tariffs, sending the case back to the Court of International Trade (CIT) for further proceedings. Judge Richard Eaton at the CIT has taken a proactive role, issuing orders for immediate refunds on unliquidated entries and directing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to develop a new automated refund system—CAPE—within 45 days. While the CIT has not mandated that importers file claims to receive refunds, the process remains uncertain, especially for entries already fully liquidated. A new lead case, *Euro Notions Florida*, has replaced the dismissed *Atmos Filtration* as the central litigation vehicle. The episode also explores the emerging market for monetizing refund claims, where investors purchase discounted rights to future refund proceeds, though constrained by the Anti-Assignment Act. Additionally, the administration is shifting to alternative legal authorities like Section 122 (150-day tariffs), Section 301 (targeted investigations), and Section 232 (national security), while enforcement of customs laws has intensified, with the DOJ prioritizing tariff fraud cases. The episode underscores the complexity and high stakes of the refund process, with estimates of $130–170 billion in potential refunds and significant legal, financial, and procedural challenges ahead.
The Supreme Court invalidated IEPA-based tariffs, but did not rule on refunds—leaving that to lower courts.
Judge Eaton at the CIT has ordered immediate refunds for unliquidated entries and is overseeing CBP’s CAPE platform development.
Refunds for fully liquidated entries will not be included in Phase 1 of the CAPE system, creating a two-tiered process.
A market has emerged for monetizing refund claims, with investors buying rights at 15–20 cents on the dollar pre-decision, now rising with increased certainty.
The Anti-Assignment Act limits direct claim transfers, requiring creative contractual structures to manage credit risk.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introduction and Guest Introductions
Michael Laughlin introduces the episode and welcomes guests Eric Cadell and Andrew DeFilippis, co-heads of S&C’s Tariffs Response Team and National Security Practice, to discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in *Learning Resources* and its implications.
Supreme Court Decision in Learning Resources
“The court decided that the authority under which the Trump administration had been using to issue various tariffs... did not, in fact, authorize the president to impose tariffs.”
Refund Process and CAPE Platform Development
“Judge Eaton himself stated that he thinks the refund process should take place pretty smoothly and that all are entitled to refunds regardless of whether they filed a claim with the Court of International Trade.”
Litigation Shift: From Atmos Filtration to Euro Notions Florida
The original lead case, *Atmos Filtration*, was voluntarily dismissed. Judge Eaton has now shifted focus to *Euro Notions Florida*, which is now the central case for refund-related rulings and CAPE implementation updates.
The Normal Refund Process vs. the New CAPE System
Andrew DeFilippis explains the traditional protest and litigation process at the CIT, which can take years, and contrasts it with the new CAPE system designed to streamline refunds across hundreds of billions of dollars.
“Companies do not have a right to keep the refund proceeds because they ultimately passed along the cost to consumers.”
“The court decided that the authority under which the Trump administration had been using to issue various tariffs... did not, in fact, authorize the president to impose tariffs.”
“Tariff and customs fraud as their number two corporate criminal enforcement priority.”
Host
Guests
Customs and Border Protection
other
Court of International Trade
other
International Emergency Economic Powers Act
other
Judge Richard Eaton
person
CAPE Platform
other
Eric Cadell
person
Supreme Court
organization
Andrew DeFilippis
person
Learning Resources
other
Michael Laughlin
person
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Tariffs: SCOTUS Decision in Learning Resources, Refunds and Next Steps” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime