Multi-Engine Ground School Part 3: Performance and Limitations
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Multi-Engine Ground School Part 3: Performance and Limitations” inside PodZeus.
When a pilot loses one engine in a light twin-engine aircraft, performance doesn't just drop by 50%—it plummets by 80 to 90% due to the loss of both raw power and the added drag from the unfeathered propeller. This shocking reality, rooted in excess horsepower calculations, means that even if you have 200 horsepower available for climb with both engines, losing one leaves you with only 20 horsepower—barely enough to maintain altitude. The podcast debunks the myth that light twins are inherently safe on a single engine, revealing that manufacturers aren’t required to guarantee any climb rate after an engine failure—only directional control. As a result, there’s no official 'accelerate go' chart in light twin POHs because the FAA doesn’t mandate performance guarantees. Instead, pilots must rely on judgment: if you're on the ground when an engine fails, you stop. If you're airborne, you continue. This stark truth reshapes how pilots approach takeoff decisions, especially at short or high-density-altitude fields. The episode also unpacks critical concepts like drift down, single-engine ceilings, and the dangerous illusion that multi-engine aircraft are safer in emergencies—when in reality, they can simply delay a crash, not prevent it.
Losing one engine in a light twin reduces performance by 80–90%, not 50%, due to both power loss and increased drag.
Manufacturers are only required to prove directional control after an engine failure—not any climb capability.
No official 'accelerate go' chart exists for light twins because the FAA doesn’t require guaranteed climb performance on one engine.
If you're on the ground when an engine fails, your rule should be: stay on the ground—abort the takeoff.
Drift down is the inevitable descent to your single-engine absolute ceiling after an engine failure at altitude.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Welcome and Episode Overview
Host Sam Terrell welcomes listeners to the On Centerline podcast, introduces the third episode of the multi-engine ground school series, and outlines the focus on performance and limitations of multi-engine aircraft.
The 80–90% Performance Drop Myth
“We are losing between 80 and 90% of our performance when we lose one engine on a multi-engine aircraft.”
V-Speeds and Their Real-World Use
The episode reviews key V-speeds like V1, VYSE, VXSE, and V-Ref, emphasizing that VYSE is the practical equivalent of V2 in light twins and that VXSE is rarely used in training.
Accelerate Stop vs. Accelerate Go
“You are not guaranteed any climb whatsoever and the manufacturer didn't even have to prove to the FAA that you could to get certification.”
Why Light Twins Have No Accelerate Go Charts
“They need to be able to control the aircraft in the lateral plane. You do not need to be able to control or get any amount of performance in the vertical plane.”
“You are not guaranteed any climb whatsoever and the manufacturer didn't even have to prove to the FAA that you could to get certification.”
“we are losing between 80 and 90 of our performance when we lose one engine on a multi -engine”
“If we have an engine failure and we are on the ground, regardless of speed, if we're on the ground, we're staying on the ground.”
Host
Sam Terrell
person
On Centerline
media
Apache
other
Piper Seminole
other
FAA
organization
Lycoming O360
other
Northwest Aeronaut
other
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Multi-Engine Ground School Part 3: Performance and Limitations” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
