Steve Kamin and Mark Sobel on the Outlook of Dollar Dominance
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Steve Kamin and Mark Sobel on the Outlook of Dollar Dominance” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of Macro Musings, host David Beckworth welcomes back two veteran international economists, Steve Kamin and Mark Sobel, to discuss the future of dollar dominance in a rapidly shifting global economic landscape. The conversation centers on whether the U.S. dollar’s long-standing global supremacy is under threat, with Kamin and Sobel cautioning that while the dollar remains dominant, its foundations are being eroded by a series of 'termites'—namely, poor fiscal policy, erosion of trust in institutions, strained alliances, and the overuse of financial sanctions. They analyze recent market behavior, including the dollar’s unexpected decline after President Trump’s 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April 2025, which briefly disrupted its safe-haven status. However, they conclude that the dollar has since regained its traditional flight-to-safety role, suggesting that short-term policy shocks alone are not enough to dislodge its dominance. The discussion then turns to the Treasury Foreign Exchange Report, the role of dollar stablecoins, and the controversial use of Section 122 of the 1974 Trade Act to justify new tariffs, which the guests argue lacks economic justification. Finally, they examine the emerging 'second China shock,' where China’s massive manufacturing exports, driven by state investment and a weak yuan, are posing new challenges to global trade and development pathways for emerging economies.
Dollar dominance remains resilient, but its foundations are being weakened by long-term structural issues like fiscal profligacy and institutional erosion.
The dollar’s safe-haven status is not easily dislodged—market behavior after the 2025 tariffs showed a temporary disruption, but the dollar quickly reverted to its traditional role.
Dollar stablecoins could add incremental demand for U.S. treasuries, but their impact is likely marginal—around 6% of total dollar assets—making them a helpful but not transformative force.
Using trade tools like 301 investigations to address currency issues is economically flawed and politically risky, as exchange rates are driven by broad macroeconomic forces, not just bilateral trade balances.
China’s current account surpluses are likely to persist due to state-driven investment and weak domestic demand, posing long-term challenges for global trade and development in emerging markets.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introduction to Dollar Dominance and the Guests
David Beckworth introduces the episode and welcomes back Steve Kamin and Mark Sobel, both seasoned policymakers with deep experience at the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury. Beckworth sets the stage for a discussion on the future of dollar dominance, referencing their recent Financial Times article titled 'Termites Eating at the Foundation of Dollar Dominance.'
The 'Termites' Undermining Dollar Dominance
“If the dollar were to be dislodged, it would be not so much because of competition from Europe or China but because of bad economic policies in the US.”
The 2025 Tariff Shock and Dollar Behavior
“For several months after Liberation Day, that sensitivity turned negative. When volatility went up, the dollar fell, making the dollar less like a safe haven currency and more like an emerging market-style risk-on currency.”
The Role of Dollar Stablecoins
The guests assess the potential impact of dollar-pegged stablecoins, estimating that even if they reach $4 trillion in circulation by 2030, only about $2.6 trillion would represent new demand for dollar assets. This amounts to roughly 6% of the total $43 trillion universe of relevant dollar assets—material but not transformative.
The Treasury Foreign Exchange Report and Policy Implications
Mark Sobel explains the history and limitations of the Treasury Foreign Exchange Report, highlighting how it has evolved from a symbolic tool to a more analytical document. He notes growing concerns about transparency in China’s foreign exchange practices and the report’s rare admission that U.S. fiscal policy contributes to current account deficits.
“If the dollar were to be dislodged, it would be not so much because of competition from Europe or China but because of bad economic policies in the US.”
“We don’t care about dollar dominance as an end in itself. But what it represents is that we have prosperity and we’re thriving.”
“For several months after Liberation Day, that sensitivity turned negative. When volatility went up, the dollar fell, making the dollar less like a safe haven currency and more like an emerging market-style risk-on currency.”
Host
Guests
Steve Kamin
person
Mark Sobel
person
David Beckworth
person
China
place
Trump administration
organization
U.S. Department of Treasury
organization
Federal Reserve Board
organization
Section 122
other
VIX
other
301 investigation
other
Kris Mitchener on What Actually Anchors the Price Level
Macro Musings with David Beckworth • 56m • 4/13/2026
Rich Clarida on Navigating Monetary Policy in Choppy Waters
Macro Musings with David Beckworth • 52m • 4/20/2026
Basil Halperin on Macroeconomic Policy in an Age of Transformative AI
Macro Musings with David Beckworth • 56m • 4/27/2026
Peter Conti-Brown and David Beckworth on All Things Financial Regulation
Macro Musings with David Beckworth • 54m • 5/4/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Steve Kamin and Mark Sobel on the Outlook of Dollar Dominance” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
