How to Sell a Genocide - 386

Left Anchor1h 11mApril 9, 2026

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “How to Sell a Genocide - 386” inside PodZeus.

AI-Generated Summary

In this powerful episode of Left Anchor, hosts Alexi the Greek and Ryan Cooper welcome author Adam Johnson to discuss his new book, *How to Sell a Genocide: The Media's Complicity in the Destruction of Gaza*. Johnson dismantles the narrative that the media’s coverage of the Gaza genocide is neutral or balanced, arguing instead that center-left institutions like the New York Times, CNN, and the Washington Post have systematically enabled the genocide through a web of linguistic double standards, editorial bias, and institutional deference to Israel. He presents quantitative evidence showing that Israeli victims are described with extreme emotive language like 'massacre' and 'barbaric' hundreds of times, while Palestinian deaths are almost never described with the same terms—despite being vastly more numerous. Johnson exposes how media outlets adopted a new, unprecedented standard requiring Israeli confirmation before attributing blame for attacks in Gaza, a rule never applied to other conflicts. He also critiques the liberal media’s 'neutrality' narrative, which emerged after October 7th as a cover for abandoning Palestinian lives, and dissects the strategic manipulation of language—such as redefining 'ceasefire' to mean Hamas surrender—to maintain the illusion of diplomacy while enabling ongoing violence. The episode further explores how this media complicity is rooted in a broader imperial logic, with Zionism acting as an accelerant of U.S. imperialism, and how both Democratic and Republican elites have enabled war crimes under the guise of 'rules-based order' and 'universalism.' The conversation ends with a warning about the rise of figures like Tucker Carlson, whose anti-interventionist rhetoric masks a dangerous anti-Semitic undercurrent, and the urgent need for a credible, institutional anti-Zionist voice to counter the growing tide of reactionary populism. Key takeaways include: 1) The media’s use of emotive language is not accidental but a deliberate tool to dehumanize Palestinians and sanctify Israeli violence; 2) The media’s 'neutrality' after October 7th was a strategic retreat from moral responsibility, not a principled stance; 3) The redefinition of 'ceasefire' as 'Hamas surrender' is a linguistic sleight of hand that legitimizes genocide; 4) Liberal institutions have enabled genocide not through overt support, but through silence, obfuscation, and the laundering of violence through false objectivity; 5) The media’s whitewashing of Gaza is now being extended to the war in Iran, signaling a systemic pattern of imperial propaganda; 6) The absence of a strong institutional anti-Zionist voice leaves space for dangerous demagogues like Tucker Carlson to exploit public outrage; 7) The U.S. political elite’s bipartisan support for Israel is not a failure of ideology but a feature of a deeper imperial project; 8) True accountability requires not just protest, but the creation of alternative media ecosystems that center Palestinian agency and truth.

Key Takeaways
1

The media’s use of emotive language is a deliberate tool to dehumanize Palestinians and sanctify Israeli violence.

2

The media’s 'neutrality' after October 7th was a strategic retreat from moral responsibility, not a principled stance.

3

The redefinition of 'ceasefire' as 'Hamas surrender' is a linguistic sleight of hand that legitimizes genocide.

4

Liberal institutions have enabled genocide not through overt support, but through silence, obfuscation, and the laundering of violence through false objectivity.

5

The media’s whitewashing of Gaza is now being extended to the war in Iran, signaling a systemic pattern of imperial propaganda.

…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus

Chapters
0:00
2 min

Introduction to the Book and the Media's Role in Gaza

The hosts introduce Adam Johnson and his new book, *How to Sell a Genocide*, which examines how center-left media institutions enabled the genocide in Gaza through systematic linguistic and editorial bias. They set the stage by highlighting the book's focus on liberal media rather than right-wing outlets, arguing that liberal complicity is more pernicious due to its credibility and influence.

2:00
3 min

The Quantified Double Standard in Media Language

References to massacre on MSNBC of Israelis 177 versus 8 of Palestinians. References to barbaric were 46 versus zero. References to savage was 23 versus zero. Admissions of slaughter were 102 versus zero.

Highlight
5:00
5 min

The Invention of a New Editorial Standard for Gaza

This was a new criteria they invented. I had a source that explained this to me. This was not something you'd ever seen before but then Mark Thompson, the head of CNN, sent out a memo which has been published in The Intercept and elsewhere saying basically we can't – we have to confirm that Israel did something by Israel itself.

Highlight
10:00
5 min

The Naturalization of Palestinian Suffering and the 'Disasterification' of Gaza

They reduced Gaza to a hurricane or an act of God. And I did an analysis of just front page headlines by the New York Times. And in that analysis, I found that on the first month, I think something like 24 headlines centered Israeli agency and only one headline centered Israeli agency in a comparable example when they began the genocide.

Highlight
15:00
5 min

The Myth of Liberal Objectivity and the 'Neutrality' Cover-Up

Johnson dismantles the claim that media outlets adopted neutrality after October 7th. He argues this was a strategic retreat from accountability, designed to protect liberal institutions from criticism while maintaining their credibility. He traces how organizations like the New York Times, Penn America, and the Southern Poverty Law Center suddenly declared neutrality, despite prior activism on issues like racial justice and Ukraine.

High-Impact Quotes
References to massacre on MSNBC of Israelis 177 versus 8 of Palestinians. References to barbaric were 46 versus zero. References to savage was 23 versus zero. Admissions of slaughter were 102 versus zero.
Adam Johnson10:16
Viral: 92.0
This was a new criteria they invented. I had a source that explained this to me. This was not something you'd ever seen before but then Mark Thompson, the head of CNN, sent out a memo which has been published in The Intercept and elsewhere saying basically we can't – we have to confirm that Israel did something by Israel itself.
Adam Johnson18:01
Viral: 88.0
They reduced Gaza to a hurricane or an act of God. And I did an analysis of just front page headlines by the New York Times. And in that analysis, I found that on the first month, I think something like 24 headlines centered Israeli agency and only one headline centered Israeli agency in a comparable example when they began the genocide.
Adam Johnson13:36
Viral: 85.0
Speakers

Hosts

Alexi the GreekRyan Cooper

Guest

Adam Johnson
Topics Discussed
Media Bias and Double Standards95%Genocide and the Destruction of Gaza93%Liberal Hypocrisy and Institutional Neutrality90%Zionism and U.S. Imperialism88%Language and Propaganda in War Coverage85%The Role of the U.S. State Department80%The Rise of Anti-Zionist Populism78%The Myth of American Innocence75%
People & Brands

Israel

place

35xNegative

Gaza

place

30xNegative

New York Times

organization

25xNegative

Biden

person

22xNegative

Iran

place

20xNegative

CNN

organization

18xNegative

Tucker Carlson

person

18xNegative

Trump

person

16xNegative

Netanyahu

person

15xNegative

Hamas

organization

14xNegative

Get the full intelligence

Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “How to Sell a Genocide - 386” inside PodZeus.

Start discovering podcast insights today

Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.

No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime