Should privacy be a tradable right?
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Should privacy be a tradable right?” inside PodZeus.
This episode of InFocus by The Hindu explores the ethical and societal implications of treating privacy as a tradable commodity in the digital age, particularly in the context of India's evolving data protection landscape. Host Ji Sampath engages with Hrithika Khera, Professor of Economics at IIT Delhi, author of the paper 'Data and Privacy: Putting Markets in Their Place,' which argues that markets for personal data constitute 'noxious markets'—analogous to markets for organs, blood, or child labor—due to inherent vulnerabilities, information asymmetry, and societal harm. The discussion reveals how India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023, despite recognizing privacy as a fundamental right, fails to protect citizens due to weak enforcement, low digital literacy, and exploitative data practices. The episode highlights real-world harms, including mental health data being sold, loan apps using blackmail via stolen photos, and algorithmic manipulation that fuels polarization and undermines democracy. Khera emphasizes that consent mechanisms are illusory, data minimization is essential, and privacy should be protected not as a luxury but as a foundational human right critical to autonomy and democratic integrity. Key takeaways include: 1) Consent is meaningless when users are unaware or coerced; 2) Data profiling enables behavioral manipulation and undermines democratic discourse; 3) Privacy is not elitist—it’s essential for ordinary people’s freedom and safety; 4) The current system creates 'data shadows' that harm individuals even without their consent; 5) Regulatory frameworks like DPDP Act 2023 risk undermining both privacy and the right to information; 6) Alternatives like data minimization and privacy-preserving technologies must be prioritized; 7) Markets for personal data are inherently noxious and should be curtailed; 8) Public awareness and friction in data extraction are crucial for systemic change. The episode concludes with a call for deeper societal debate and structural reforms to reclaim privacy as a non-negotiable human right.
Consent mechanisms are illusory and often coercive, especially for vulnerable populations.
Data profiling enables behavioral manipulation, addiction, and political polarization.
Privacy is not a luxury—it is essential for autonomy, mental well-being, and democratic participation.
Data minimization is a critical first step in protecting privacy.
The current data economy creates 'data shadows' that harm individuals without their knowledge.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
The Myth of Consent in the Digital Age
The episode opens with a critique of the consent regime in data collection, questioning whether ticking a box truly constitutes informed consent. The host highlights how even basic actions like parking a car can require sharing personal data, raising concerns about why such data is needed and who benefits.
Privacy as a Fundamental Right Under Siege
The discussion centers on India's 2017 Puttaswamy judgment recognizing privacy as a fundamental right, contrasted with the reality of its erosion under the 2023 DPDP Act. The guest argues that even strong laws like GDPR would not prevent privacy harms due to corporate practices.
The Noxious Market: Data as a Commodity
“The market for personal data has meets at least most of these conditions. And so then, of course, the question arises, what should we do? I think the market for personal data is a noxious market.”
Real-World Harms: From Loan Apps to Mental Health Data
“In one case, they found that they took some photos or videos from the gallery of that person and morphed it. And then they used that to blackmail saying we'll send this compromised video or photo to all the contacts on your list.”
The Erosion of Democracy and Autonomy
“This kind of data profiling, personal profiling based algorithmic nudging and behavioral modification is actually a feature. It's not a bug. It's a feature that promotes polarization. It's inevitable.”
“The market for personal data has meets at least most of these conditions. And so then, of course, the question arises, what should we do? I think the market for personal data is a noxious market.”
“In one case, they found that they took some photos or videos from the gallery of that person and morphed it. And then they used that to blackmail saying we'll send this compromised video or photo to all the contacts on your list.”
“This kind of data profiling, personal profiling based algorithmic nudging and behavioral modification is actually a feature. It's not a bug. It's a feature that promotes polarization. It's inevitable.”
Host
Guest
Ji Sampath
person
Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023
other
Hrithika Khera
person
GDPR
other
Aadhaar
other
Puttaswamy Judgment
other
Cambridge Analytica
organization
Banksy
other
Shoshana Zuboff
person
RTI
other
The Tamil Nadu way: How to reverse India's creeping centralisation
In Focus by The Hindu • 38m • 3/31/2026
Assembly elections: Can the Left overcome anti-incumbency in Kerala?
In Focus by The Hindu • 47m • 4/1/2026
Why has the FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026 sparked such outrage?
In Focus by The Hindu • 28m • 4/2/2026
Is cinema a positive influence in Tamil Nadu politics?
In Focus by The Hindu • 35m • 4/2/2026
West Bengal elections: How will SIR voter deletions and anti-incumbency shape outcomes?
In Focus by The Hindu • 36m • 4/3/2026
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Should privacy be a tradable right?” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime
