Blow that Whistle Loud! Anti-SLAPP and Other Protections for Whistleblowers
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Blow that Whistle Loud! Anti-SLAPP and Other Protections for Whistleblowers” inside PodZeus.
In this episode of Fraud in America, host Jackie DeMar explores the growing threat of Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) targeting whistleblowers, particularly in the context of False Claims Act and other whistleblower cases. Guests Clayton Wire and Grace Park—both experienced whistleblower attorneys—explain how retaliatory lawsuits are used by corporations not to win judgments, but to intimidate, drain resources, and deter future disclosures. They detail common counterclaims like defamation, breach of confidentiality agreements, and trade secret misappropriation, emphasizing that these suits often stem from whistleblowers' extraneous statements or document collection before legal counsel is involved. The discussion highlights the critical importance of early legal consultation, jurisdictional strategy, and the use of anti-SLAPP statutes—especially in states like California and Colorado—that offer robust protections and automatic attorney fee shifting if successful. The hosts also address the financial burden of defending such suits, the limited role of insurance, and the need for nonprofit defense funds, underscoring that while risks exist, they are manageable with proper legal support. The episode concludes with a powerful message: despite the dangers, whistleblowers must come forward because the public interest in exposing fraud outweighs the risks. The legal system, though patchwork and uneven across states, is increasingly equipped with tools to protect those who speak up. The hosts stress that courage and legal preparedness go hand in hand, and encourage listeners to reach out to experienced attorneys and support organizations like TAF. The episode serves as both a warning and a call to action, reinforcing the essential role of whistleblowers in maintaining integrity in government and business.
Anti-SLAPP laws in states like California and Colorado provide strong protections for whistleblowers, including automatic attorney fee shifting if the motion to strike succeeds.
Whistleblowers should consult an experienced attorney before taking any action—especially regarding document collection—to avoid triggering retaliatory lawsuits.
Jurisdiction matters significantly: filing in a state with strong anti-SLAPP laws can prevent defendants from dragging cases to less protective venues.
Defendants often file SLAPPs not to win, but to intimidate, drain resources, and deter others from whistleblowing—making early legal defense critical.
Insurance coverage for SLAPPs is rare and highly dependent on policy language; homeowners’ policies often exclude intentional acts or defamation claims.
…and 3 more takeaways available in PodZeus
Introducing SLAPPs and Their Purpose
“These are retaliatory claims that are brought against whistleblowers and others... they're not always looking to win a judgment. They're usually looking to drain resources or deter others from whistleblowing.”
Meet the Experts: Clayton Wire and Grace Park
Clayton Wire and Grace Park introduce their backgrounds in whistleblower law, emphasizing their work representing individuals in False Claims Act cases, retaliation claims, and anti-retaliation matters.
When Whistleblowers Come to You: The Typical Client Stage
Both attorneys describe that most clients reach out before filing any formal complaint—often after internal reporting or facing retaliation like termination or administrative leave.
The Real Purpose of SLAPPs: Deterrence, Not Victory
“They want to try to turn the tide... trying to tour our clients from moving forward at the case, create exposure for them so that maybe they get cold feet.”
Common SLAPP Counterclaims: Defamation, NDAs, and Trade Secrets
The attorneys break down typical retaliatory claims, including defamation, breach of confidentiality agreements, and trade secret misappropriation, often stemming from extraneous statements or document collection.
“There are risks because they can be managed. They're not a reason to not do the right thing.”
“All of that gets undermined and thrown out the window if we allow corporate entities to be able to come after folks for doing the right thing.”
“They want to try to turn the tide... trying to tour our clients from moving forward at the case, create exposure for them so that maybe they get cold feet.”
Host
Guests
Clayton Wire
person
Grace Park
person
False Claims Act
other
California anti-SLAPP statute
other
Jackie DeMar
person
TAF.org
organization
Getnick Law
organization
Colorado anti-SLAPP statute
other
Ninth Circuit
other
Anti-Fraud Coalition
organization
Get the full intelligence
Search transcripts, export clips, track mentions, and explore all topics from “Blow that Whistle Loud! Anti-SLAPP and Other Protections for Whistleblowers” inside PodZeus.
Start discovering podcast insights today
Start with a 7-day trial and explore a growing catalog of popular podcasts. No credit card required.
No credit card required • 7-day trial • Cancel anytime