The ONLY Wide Receivers You Need in Your 2026 Fantasy Football Drafts | Round-By-Round Targets (Ep. 1988)

In this episode of the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Football Podcast, hosts Ryan Warmly, Andrew Erickson, and Jake Seeley dive deep into wide receiver targets for the 2026 fantasy football draft, analyzing players round by round. The discussion begins with high-end value picks like Justin Jefferson, who is praised for his elite talent and potential rebound with Kyler Murray in Minnesota, despite concerns about the quarterback fit. Jake sees value in Chris Olave, highlighting his strong connection with Tyler Shook and his potential in a high-volume offense. The conversation then shifts to risk-reward picks like Rasheed Rice, whose upside is tied to Mahomes’ health and a possible suspension, though Jake remains skeptical in March. Devontae Adams is debated heavily—Erickson downgrades him due to age, declining efficiency, and new competition, while Jake sees him as a top-tier option if the Rams’ offense stays intact. Jalen Waddle’s trade to Denver is framed as a potential breakout opportunity, though concerns about his durability and Sean Payton’s offense linger. Later rounds feature strong value picks like DJ Moore (Bills), Marvin Harrison Jr. (Cardinals), Ricky Pearsall (49ers), and Romeo Dobbs (Patriots), with both hosts agreeing on the latter’s undervaluation. The episode ends with a lively back-and-forth on player rankings, showcasing differing philosophies on risk, health, and offensive context. Key takeaways include: 1) Prioritize elite talent with upside over perceived safety, especially with quarterback upgrades; 2) Injuries and coaching changes can create massive value in mid-to-late rounds; 3) Players like Marvin Harrison Jr. and Romeo Dobbs are prime candidates to outperform their current ADP due to opportunity and under-the-radar potential; 4) Avoid overvaluing players based on past performance without considering new context; 5) Consider the offensive scheme and quarterback play as much as individual stats when evaluating receivers. The overall tone is optimistic and engaging, with hosts embracing debate as part of the draft process.